UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ
AS/SCP/1316
Graduate Council
2000-2001
Annual Report
To the Academic Senate, Santa Cruz Division:
This past year was an extremely busy one for the Graduate Council. The
Graduate Council (GC) generally met on a biweekly basis throughout the year,
meeting 16 times. The voting membership of GC was comprised of 11 Senate
members [J. Aissen, K. Bassi (F,S), D. Belanger (Chair,W,S), M. Dooley, O. Einarsdottir, P. Kolaitis (Chair,
F,member,W,S), D. Jones (F,W), T. Miller (W), P. Nauert, B. Rogoff, M. Schlag
(W,S), A. Todorov (F) and Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies F.
Talamantes]. Meetings were also attended by Graduate Division staff members (R.
Hastings and J. Newman), Graduate Student Association representatives (T. Chin,
D. Raymond and L. Ritscher), a library representative (B. Remak-Honnef), and a
member of the Academic Senate Office staff (L. Babka). The Chairs, P.
Kolaitis(F) and D. Belanger(W,S) also served as Graduate Council
representatives to the Systemwide Coordinating Committee on Graduate Affairs (CCGA),
the Senate Advisory Committee, the Academic Planning Council and several ad hoc
committees on campus. Guests to the Graduate Council in 2000-01 included
Chancellor M.R.C. Greenwood, Assistant Chancellor J. Armstrong, Vice Provost
for Academic Affairs G. Brown, Ombudsman S. Gottehrer, incoming Associate Dean
of Graduate Studies D. Hunter, Center for Teaching Excellence E. Tanner, Labor
Relations Director L. Listmann, Prof. C. Soussloff and Prof. Q. Williams
(Graduate Council Chair 2001-02).
1.
Graduate Council organization
To address its rapidly growing workload, in early fall the Graduate
Council drafted legislation that would increase its membership to ten Senate
members from six Senate members (plus the Graduate Dean, ex officio). In
addition, the proposed legislation provided for an increase in graduate student
representation to three Graduate Student Association (GSA) representatives from
two GSA representatives. With the
cooperation of the Committee on Committees, this legislation was introduced and
unanimously approved at the November 9, 2000 meeting of the Academic
Senate. Later in the same meeting, new
Graduate Council members were nominated, unanimously approved, and began
serving immediately.
In addition, the Council itself has reorganized informally so that much
of its work is done in subcommittees.
This has increased the efficiency and effectiveness of the Council. A formal confidentiality policy for the Graduate
Council has been adopted.
2. The Coordinating Committee on
Graduate Affairs (CCGA)
The Systemwide Coordinating Committee on Graduate Affairs (CCGA)
reviews and makes recommendations on all proposals approved by campus graduate
councils for new graduate programs and organized research units in the UC
system. During 2000-01 CCGA reviewed one new UCSC graduate degree program and
one UCSC administrative restructuring of a degree program. The proposed graduate program in Music was
not approved. The Biology graduate
program restructuring, in which the existing program will be administered by
the now separate Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology and Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology departments, was approved as an interim solution with the
expectation that full proposals for separate graduate programs reflecting the
independent departments would be submitted in the near future.
CCGA also reviews changes in Academic Senate Regulations pertaining to
graduate degrees proposed by the divisional Academic Senates that require
Academic Council approval. It also discusses and makes recommendations on a
number of issues of importance to UC graduate programs. Issues discussed during
2000-01 include:
·
Future UC graduate
student enrollments in an environment of rapid undergraduate growth
·
Graduate membership and
voting on CCGA
·
Postdoctoral education
and representation on the CCGA
·
Sources and levels of
financial support for graduate students
·
UC/CSU joint doctoral
degrees
·
Revisions of the Master
Plan for Higher Education
·
Masters of Advanced
Studies
·
Impact of the summer
session on graduate education
·
Development of graduate
programs at UC Merced.
3. Program reviews
The Graduate Council participates in the periodic external review of
departments and organized research units at UCSC. The Council reviews the draft
charges prior to the external review, reviews the external review report and
all associated documents, and participates in the closure meeting. It follows
up the external review when issues of significance to the health of graduate
programs are revealed. The Council participates in reviews of departments
whenever issues concerning graduate education are discussed. This includes
departments that are planning to introduce graduate degrees (or participate in
joint programs) and those for which the external reviewers are asked to comment
on the appropriateness of a future graduate program. In 2000-01, the Council
participated in closure reviews of Art, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and
Sociology. The Council reviewed draft charges for Art History, Computer
Engineering, Computer Science, Mathematics, Politics, and Psychology.
The Council discussed its dissatisfaction with the current departmental
review process and made recommendations to the Vice Provost for Academic
Affairs for ways in which the process might be improved. The Council wishes to be more directly
involved in the process so that its oversight is strengthened. In addition, it developed a new program
review charge template that should help in strengthening the reviews.
4. Changes of status and degree
requirements
The Council considered a number of requests from particular
programs. As part of its regular
business, the Council reviewed all new graduate courses and course
revisions. The criteria for course
approvals were discussed, including frequent problems in compliance with UC
Senate Regulation 762 requiring that, for graduate courses, the content,
performance criteria, requirements and goals be clearly differentiated from
those corresponding to undergraduate courses.
Parenthetical notations were approved for the Ph.D. programs in
Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology and Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology. The Council approved the
increase of normative time from six to seven years for the Anthropology
program. The Council revised the
definitions of full and part-time enrollment status.
The CCGA completed its review of capstone requirements of UCSC Masters
Degree programs. After requested
changes in the practices and stated regulations in several departments, the
Graduate Council is now satisfied that all UCSC masters degree programs are in
compliance with UC regulations governing capstone requirements.
5. New graduate program proposal
reviews
The Graduate Council must approve new degree proposals before they
advance to the Systemwide levels of approval. The Council has taken an active
role to increase the likelihood that a new program will be approved rapidly by
reviewing early drafts of proposals. The Council considers all issues that
relate to the viability and success of a new program, including curricular coherence
and sufficiency, graduate student support resources and potential need for the
program. Typically, the Council makes recommendations aimed at clarifying and
completing the description of degree requirements, conforming to academic
regulations, realistically estimating graduate support needs and availability,
stating the case for the program, and realistically addressing issues of job
prospects for graduates. All of these concerns will be raised at higher levels
of review, once the proposal leaves the campus.
In 2000-01, the Council reviewed and approved proposals for graduate
degree programs in Education and Electrical Engineering, which will be
forwarded to CCGA for review. The
Council reviewed and commented on a preliminary proposal for Visual and Performance
Arts and encouraged further development, including a viable administrative
support structure.
6.
Academic Senate bylaws and regulations (Santa Cruz Division) and
Graduate Council Policies
The Council is continuing its work on revising the Graduate Student
Handbook which now states the official policies of the Graduate Council. The Committee on Rules, Jurisdiction and
Elections has agreed to place the policies of the Graduate Council for which
the Council has plenary authority in an appendix to the Senate Regulations
rather than being listed as part of the Senate Regulations themselves. Regulations for which the Council does not
have plenary authority will remain in the main listing of the Senate Regulations.
7. Graduate student issues
The Council considered in depth the issue of 301 courses and the
evaluation of teaching assistants. It
was decided that the courses should be abolished since it is difficult to
design such courses in a way that ensures the separation of course reviews and
TA employment evaluations. Discussion
on possible replacement courses did not resolve this fundamental conflict and
so no recommendations concerning replacement courses were adopted by the
Council.
The Council discussed TA training issues including improved TA training
raised by the implementation of the TA contract. The Division of Graduate Studies and the Center for Teaching
Excellence will undertake the development of a new TA training program.
The Graduate Council drafted and approved a new policy on Academic
Integrity for Graduate Students. This
policy has been forwarded to the Dean of Graduate Studies for final approval.
The policy on Academic Progress was discussed as well as policy regarding the
rule on 50% employment for graduate students and exceptions to those
rules. Policies governing late
acceptances during the graduate admissions process were reviewed. The Graduate Council approved a change in
the definition of regular course load for graduate students. The Council discussed further the importance
of affordable housing on campus. The
lack of affordable housing is significantly impacting our graduate student
recruitments.
The Council has begun a discussion of its oversight responsibilities
with regard to UC bylaw 330.B.3.b., requiring the Graduate Council to ``Set
policy and standards for Appointment of graduate students as Teaching
Assistants, Teaching Fellows, Research Assistants, and recipients of University
Fellowships''. The Council has requested
divisional deans to explain their policies with regard to appointments of
Teaching Assistants.
The Council approved guidelines proposed by Ombudsman Gottehrer
pertaining to Faculty Advisor - Graduate Student Relationships. This policy will be included in the Graduate
Handbook, the General Catalog and on UCSC Web pages.
The Graduate Student Association keeps the Council informed of policy
matters and proposes issues for Council review. Issues discussed with the Council for informational purposes
include housing, parking, support for dissertation writing, the Dissertation
Writing Workshop, TA training, the Graduate Commons, career planning,
fellowship support, and summer support.
8. Postdoctoral education at UCSC
UC Graduate Councils are vested with oversight responsibility regarding
the welfare of postdoctoral scholars by Systemwide Senate Bylaw 330.B.3c.
Further consideration of the role that the UCSC Graduate Council should play in
this regard will continue.
9. Graduate enrollment and graduate
student support
The Graduate Council reviews the allocation of fellowship block grant
funds across programs by the Division of Graduate Studies each year. No major
changes were made in the allocation formulas this year. The Council consults with the Vice Provost
and Dean of Graduate Studies on a number of issues concerning graduate student
support, admissions, and welfare. The Dean kept the Council informed throughout
the year on enrollment statistics and concomitant issues regarding graduate
student support.
The Graduate Council discussed the problems expected in the recruitment
of graduate students during the anticipated rapid growth of undergraduate
student numbers over the next decade.
With an expected overall growth to nearly 17,000 students at UCSC, the
Council is concerned that the relative proportion of graduate students be
maintained well above the 10 percent level.
This will be a great challenge, but one that is important if the campus
is to simultaneously attract the highest qualified faculty while hiring more
than 600 new faculty members and maintain the excellence of research at
UCSC. Issues regarding the need for
increasing both the numbers and quality of graduate students were discussed,
including the needs for additional library space and for continued library
support.
The Council selected winners of the Outstanding Teaching Assistant
award from graduate students nominated by their departments. The Council also reviewed applications and
approved Graduate Opportunity Fellowships, Cota-Robles mentorships and
Superfellowships for the 2001-02 academic year. The Superfellowships are competitive fellowships funded by EVC
Simpson for the 2001-02 year.
10.
Other graduate issues
Several issues relating to the implementation of the State-funded
Summer Session were raised by the Graduate Council with the recommendation that
they be addressed prior to the start of the program at UCSC. The Council supports the recommendations of
the Academic Task Force for the Santa Clara Valley Regional Center.
11. Graduate Groups
No formal cross-divisional Graduate Groups exist on the UCSC
campus. Graduate Groups provide the
opportunity to support graduate programs outside of the usual departmental
structure at UCSC. Graduate Groups
would allow faculty new opportunities to be involved in graduate education and
provide an important mechanism for graduate growth on the campus. After gathering and analyzing information
about Graduate Groups at other UC campuses, the Graduate Council approved in
the fall a set of guidelines spelling out the academic criteria for the
establishment of Graduate Groups at UCSC.
These guidelines were submitted to the Vice Provost for Academic
Affairs. The Graduate Council looks
forward to working with the administration to create transparent mechanisms for
initiation of Graduate Groups on the campus.
12. Participation in other committees
Members of the Graduate Council serve on other committees as
representatives of the Academic Senate's interest in graduate education and
graduate student welfare. Graduate Council members served on several committees
this year: P. Kolaitis and D. Belanger served on the Senate Advisory Committee;
P. Kolaitis, D. Belanger and B. Rogoff served as Graduate Council
representatives to the Academic Planning Council; B. Rogoff served on the Evaluation
Reform Committee; P. Kolaitis, D. Belanger and L. Ritscher served on CCGA. In addition, D. Belanger served on the
Senate Planning Workshop Retreat.
13. Issues carrying forward to
2000-01
-
Completion of Graduate
Student Handbook revisions.
-
Review of requirements
for eligibility for participation by graduate students in commencement
ceremonies.
-
Discussion of the role
of the Graduate Council with regard to Postdoctoral Scholars.
-
Discussion of financial
support and recruitment resources required to ensure the growth of the graduate
program during the current undergraduate growth phase.
-
Facilitating the
creation of and advising on procedures for Graduate Groups.
-
TA training and
appointment oversight.
-
Revision of the course
review process.
-
Revision of departmental
external review procedures.
The Graduate Council appreciates the participation on the Council by
Beth Remak-Honnef as the Library representative and by Tina Chin, Lee Ritscher,
and Dave Raymond as graduate student representatives.
Respectfully submitted,
GRADUATE COUNCIL
J. Aissen
K. Bassi (F,S)
M. Dooley
O. Einarsdottir
D. Jones (F,S)
T. Miller (W)
P. Nauert
B. Rogoff
M. Schlag
F. Talamantes (Vice Provost and Dean)
A. Todorov (F)
P. Kolaitis (Chair, F)
D. Belanger (Chair, W, S)
September 20, 2001