UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ

AS/SCP/1251

 

The Committee on Teaching
1998-1999Annual Report

To the Academic Senate, Santa Cruz Division:

The Committee on Teaching (COT) met approximately twice per month to carry out its charge of fostering and promoting the teaching mission of the campus. The work and accomplishments of the Committee during the 1998-99 year are summarized below.

Millennium Committee Report Recommendations

The Millennium Committee (MC) made three recommendations for COT to consider. First, a campus Student Learning Center was proposed. COT endorsed the proposal as a good idea that could help coordinate opportunities for students. COT agreed that it would be willing to serve in an advisory role in the planning or oversight of a Learning Center. Additionally, the COT chair wrote a column in support of a Student Learning Center for the Winter issue of Faculty Focus.

Second, the MC Report recommended an evaluation of the UCSC student advising system. COT discussed this topic with AVCUE Lynda Goff at an October 27, 1998 meeting. Associate Vice Chancellor Goff indicated that campus advising was an issue that she would pursue during the year.

One last COT-related recommendation appeared in the MC Report. COT was encouraged to support applications for projects that combine teaching with research when considering Instruction Improvement Program grants. This recommendation is consistent with COT’s existing policy of supporting teaching projects that also make connections to research. At the same time, COT recognizes that many worthy projects do not readily allow for integration with research.

Instructional Improvement Program Grants

One of the Committee’s more substantive charges is to evaluate faculty and staff applications for Instructional Improvement Program (IIP) Grants. COT considered a total of 77 proposals. In all, 63 applications were funded for a total of $307,383. This is more than double the amount granted in previous years, thanks to a $125,000 augmentation approved by EVC John Simpson to fund instructional technology in teaching. A significant balance forward from the previous year and funds returned in 1998-99 further increased resources available.

IIP grants fell into the following categories:

Mini-grants are available throughout the year when COT is in session. They support small, one-time projects designed to improve undergraduate instruction. Mini-grants have a maximum budget of $2000. In the year-long competition for Mini-grants, 44 applicants requested a total of $56,774. There were 40 funded projects for a total of $51,257.

Teaching Development Incentive Awards are for faculty who wish to experiment with activities aimed at enhancing their development as teachers. Awards are in the form of a stipend of $500 to individual faculty or $2,000 to a department, college, or interdisciplinary unit. This was the second year that COT offered this type of award. Examples of relevant projects include developing a teaching portfolio, arranging reciprocal observations and discussions of teaching with colleagues, or engaging in a team-teaching partnership. During the year, there was only one application for a Teaching Development Incentive Award. It received funding in the amount of $500.

Course Development Fellowship is a new grant category that was instituted for the first of a two-year pilot program. The award provides $6,000 to cover one course release for a fellowship recipient. Course Development Fellows use the course release to develop a new undergraduate course or program in their departments or to make significant revisions in an older course. There were 13 applications for Course Development Fellowships. Of these, 10 were funded for a total of $60,000.

Individual/Collaborative Grants offer up to $15,000 for major projects aimed at improving undergraduate education. Large projects involving instructional technology were diverted to the Classroom Technologies Grants (see below). There were 7 applications for Individual/Collaborative Grants requesting a total of $81,145. Of these, 3 were funded for a total of $25,466.

Classroom Technologies Grants offer up to $15,000 to fund instructional technologies for undergraduate or graduate classrooms. For example, applicants for these grants might wish to develop course web sites, acquire specialized instructional software, or purchase other teaching-related equipment. Unlike the other types of IIP grants, Classroom Technologies Grants came from a source of revenue known as Instructional Technology funds. There were 10 applications for Classroom Technologies Grants for a total of $132,472. Of these, 9 were funded for a total of $117,472.

To facilitate applications for IIP grants, various methods were used. The Call for Proposals went out via campus mail in the last week of October. Announcements were also made on electronic mail. The Chair of COT and the Director for the CTE participated in an open forum during the fall quarter for faculty and staff interested in the application process. The CTE Director participated in an additional forum for interested applicants during the winter quarter. The Center for Teaching Excellence also offered individual consultations to grant applicants all year long.

In an ongoing effort to make the Call for Proposals clearer and more inviting to potential applicants, the Committee on Teaching and CTE Director Eileen Tanner carried out the annual review of the Call during COT’s last meeting of the year on May 19, 1999.

Fifth Annual Convocation on Teaching

With the Associate Vice Chancellor for Undergraduate Education and the Center for Teaching Excellence, COT co-sponsored the Fifth Annual Convocation on Teaching held on May 11, 1999 at the UCSC Arboretum. State University of New York (SUNY) at Stonybrook President Shirley Strum Kenny offered a keynote address entitled, "Reinventing Undergraduate Education." President Kenny was chair of the Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. She was introduced by Chancellor Greenwood. In her talk, President Kenny highlighted several key points from the Boyer Report. Following her presentation, faculty members Lynda Goff, John Isbister, and Tyler Stovall related President Kenny’s remarks to undergraduate education at UCSC. The Convocation was moderated by the COT chair. Approximately 40 faculty and staff attended the event.

COT would like to see more faculty turn out for the Annual Convocation. This year, scheduling was constrained somewhat due to the respective schedules of President Kenny and Chancellor Greenwood. In a May 14, 1999 memo on the academic calendar, Executive Vice Chancellor John Simpson proposed having a "Teaching Colloquium" on Advising Day. At its May 19th meeting, COT endorsed the idea of holding the Convocation on Teaching on Advising Day.

National Trends

The COT Chair attended a national meeting on instructional technology sponsored by the TLT Group, an affiliate of the American Association for Higher Education (AAHE), held in Phoenix, Arizona in July 1998. Also attending the conference from UCSC were Associate Vice Chancellor for Undergraduate Education Lynda Goff, Associate Vice Chancellor for Undergraduate Admissions Michael Thompson, Center for Teaching Excellence Director Eileen Tanner, Professor Shelly Errington, Instructional Computing Director Beth Riddle, and Librarian Sue Chesley. The conference led to AVCUE Goff’s subsequent formation of a Teaching, Learning, and Technology Roundtable (TLTR) at UCSC. The TLTR includes leaders of various teaching-related committees or offices on campus, including COT.

Another AAHE conference was held in San Diego in January. The COT Chair, two COT members (Professors Locks and Padgett), and CTE Director Tanner attended. At a subsequent COT meeting, COT Chair Leaper highlighted one lesson he derived from attending the conference; that is, efforts to change the teaching culture in a university are most effective when focused on new faculty.

Teaching Academy

Following a visit to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, CTE Director Eileen Tanner proposed the formation of a UCSC Teaching Academy at COT’S February 3rd meeting. A Teaching Academy would bring together UCSC’s most outstanding teachers. The goals of the Academy would include affirming and encouraging a campus culture that values teaching. Potential members would include recipients of teaching awards, Pew Scholars, the Chancellor, the Executive Vice Chancellor, the Associate Vice Chancellor for Undergraduate Education, COT members, and the Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence. Director Tanner’s proposal was generally met with a positive reception at the COT meeting. However, no action was taken at this time. This is an agenda item that is apt to be considered further during the 1999-2000 academic year.

Teaching Credit for Team-Teaching

COT followed up on its prior efforts to devise a campuswide policy for giving faculty teaching credit for team-teaching courses. The proposal that COT drafted during the 1997-1998 year was forwarded to the Academic Senate Committee on Educational Policy (CEP) on October 30, 1998. CEP Chair George Brown submitted a reply on April 7th stating that "CEP supports the pedagogic benefits of courses … conceived as team-taught…." However, CEP did not consider how credit is awarded to faculty for team-teaching to be within its purview. On June 21st, Chair Leaper sent a request to incoming Committee on Planning and Budget Chair John Hay to consider a standardized policy across campus departments for giving faculty teaching credit for team-teaching.

Excellence in Teaching Awards

Awarding the Excellence in Teaching Awards to our colleagues is COT’s most satisfying event during the year. This year COT in coordination with CTE continued its efforts to increase publicity for these awards. The Call for Nominations appeared in all departments and colleges as well as other key locations on campus. Electronic mail announcements were sent to all faculty, department chairs, curricular deans, the Graduate Student Association, the Student Union Assembly, and All Messages. The result was a total of 31 nomination letters from students.

To select the recipients, COT considered the nomination letters from students, endorsement letters from department chairs, and statements on teaching from the nominees themselves. Nominees who had already received an Excellence in Teaching Award within the last 5 years were excluded from consideration. The COT chair, though nominated, exempted himself. COT also took into account information provided by the Registrar's Office about outstanding narrative evaluations. Nominees with missing evaluations were given an opportunity to explain or correct the Registrar’s report. Only those who were completely up to date on their narratives were considered for an award.

At COT’s May 10th meeting, members decided that beginning next year only students would be allowed to sign nomination petitions for Excellence in Teaching Awards. Past practice has allowed faculty and staff to add their signatures.

COT selected 11 faculty for Excellence in Teaching Awards. They were presented by the Chancellor and the COT Chair at a University House reception on May 27. Recipients were Judith Aissen, Linguistics; Margarita Azmitia, Psychology; George Brown, Physics; Jacqueline Brown, Anthropology; Giulia Centineo, Italian; Brent Haddad, Environmental Studies; Bruce Levine, History; Barry McLaughlin, Psychology; Nicole Paiement, Music; Sarah Rabkin, Writing; and Judy Yung, American Studies.

Official Acknowledgement of Director of Center of Teaching Excellence

The Director of the Center of Teaching Excellence has regularly worked closely with COT over the years. For example, the CTE Director is critical in the administration of the Instructional Improvement Program grants. More generally, the CTE Director’s primary role is to facilitate excellence in teaching. To acknowledge the important link between COT and CTE, COT voted at its April 21 meeting to modify the Senate COT bylaws so that they state that the Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence "shall be invited to sit with the Committee." The proposal was included on the Senate’s May 26th agenda. However, upon request, a vote on the proposal was deferred until the Senate completes a general review of administrative involvement in Senate committees.

In Gratitude

The Committee is grateful for the valuable assistance and contributions of Eileen Tanner, Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence; and Laurie Babka, staff to COT from the Academic Senate Office. Additionally, we thank the following representatives for their valuable consultations: Lynda Goff, Associate Vice Chancellor for Undergraduate Education (AVCUE); Jan Dickens, Director of Media Services; and Chris Laxton, Media Services. Nathan Sanger also offered thoughtful input as the undergraduate student representative to COT.

 

Respectfully submitted,

COMMITTEE ON TEACHING
Michael Dine
Mary-Kay Gamel
Norman Locks
Jaye Padgett
Nathan Sanger (student representative)
Campbell Leaper, Chair

 

October 15, 1999